Review

Review

All submissions will be sent to at least 2 independent reviewers selected from a group of well-established researchers by the Editor-in-Chief and will be evaluated based on originality, technical and research content, relevance to the conference, contributions, and readability. The full paper submissions will be chosen based on technical merit, interest, applicability, and how well they fit a coherent and balanced technical program.

We will first check plagiarism status of each submitted paper, and there is a hard rule that the similarity rate cannot exceed 18%. We take plagiarism cases very seriously, which include self-plagiarism of authors' own published papers. Papers with high percentage of plagiarism and self-plagiarism will not be considered. If an author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:

1.Reject the paper submitted or delete the paper from the final publications.

2.Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s).

3.Report the author’s violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.